Friday, May 26, 2017

SV: USA Africa Dialogue Series - God's wonderful world

Cornelius We-Sweden,


Who needs to insinuate when the glaring facts are there for anyone to stare at. The story began on August 20, 2010 when two women walked into the police station at the southern part of Stockholm and reported that Julian Assange had subjected them to encroachment, separately, at different time. Thus, the prosecutor declared him wanted, beside remanding him in custody in his absence for suspected rape. On 21 August 2010, the District Prosecutor, withdrew the accusation of rape while retaining the suspicion of molest. On 30 August 2010, Assange was present at the police station in Stockholm for interrogation. He admitted visiting the pussy of the two women which he claimed was mutually agreed upon and amicably perpetrated by the parties involved. He denied crime. As there was no other evidence than the words of the two women against Assange's words, the District Prosecutor could not establish a crime case. Thus, he did not apprehend Assange who left Sweden for UK.


On September 1, 2010, the Public Prosecutor overruled the District Prosecutor's decision and re-opened investigations against Assange for rape, sexual duress and harassment.


On November 18, 2010, the Public Prosecutor requested Stockholm Magistrate court to remand Assange in custody, and in absentia and it was granted. Therefore he was declared wanted internationally by the Swedish police.  


7 December 2010, the British Police arrested Assange in London and after about a week, he was released on bail.


24 February 2011, a High Court in London decided that  Assange should be extradited to Sweden for interrogation but Assange appealed against the decision on the ground that hs interrogation could be held in London by the Swedish prosecutor or police.


14 June 2012, the Privy Council in London dismissed Assange's appeal against extradition to Sweden.


Fearing that the main reason why he was being accused of rape and wanting him for interrogation in Sweden was to send him to the US for his wikileak activities, Assange sought political asylum at the Embassy of Ecuador on 19 June 2012, and it was granted on 16 August 2012. 


On 16 June 2014, Stockholm's Magistrate Court extended the decision to remand Assange in custody, in absentia.


5 February 2016, a UN-group declared that Assange was being arbitrarily detained and demanded for his immediate freedom.


14-15 November 2016, Assange was interrogated by the Swedish Prosecutor at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.


On 3 May 2017, Assange's Swedish lawyer requested Stockholm Magistrate Court to revoke detention order on his client.


19 May 2017, the prosecutor requested the Court to revoke the detention order on Julian Assange.


Following the above chronicle of events, the prosecutor in Sweden only agreed to interrogate Assange at the Embassy of Ecuador in London, after Hillary had lost the Presidential election. If the purpose of interrogation was to establish if a crime had been committed or not, why did the Swedish Prosecutor refuse to interrogate him in London by demanding that he should come to Sweden? I don't think the Swedish conscience will permit a process that will end up handing over Julian Assange to Emperor Trump and that is the main reason for the discontinuation of the case.

S. Kadiri



 




Från: usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com <usaafricadialogue@googlegroups.com> för Cornelius Hamelberg <corneliushamelberg@gmail.com>
Skickat: den 25 maj 2017 16:21
Till: USA Africa Dialogue Series
Ämne: Re: USA Africa Dialogue Series - God's wonderful world
 

Ogbeni Kadiri,


Strange is this world.

Are you insinuating that wikileaks in some small measure contributed to Trump's victory and that it's time to claim the reward : on direct orders from the king of America, the Swedish authorities now understand that it was time to close the case? Or was the case about to be proscribed anyway?

Since 16 August 2012 the cherub however, is still holed up in Ecuador's embassy in London and it seems that he dare not exit through the front or the back door, for fear of being arrested - on the spot.

Let's face it, wikileaks has done a lot of havoc - for instance leaking this unsavoury piece of treachery ...

There are so many conspiracy theories about the women who accused Assange of rape - that they are known CIA agents etc. - and that when it boils down to word against word (two against one) plus the his signature spermicidal evidence - as in the case Clinton - Lewinsky (no denying the drop shot by either lying Bill or lying Hillary)

Maybe, those of us living in Sweden are a bit biased, since we know how difficult it could be for Assange to prove that it was not all done with loving mutual consent - for enjoyment....when the woman/ women decide to say that you used a little too much force or ignored her request that you wear your raincoat - at which point - with his pants down Black man sey, " NO! me like it raw!Natural!"

I have been mostly following the case through the prism of Porter's Pensées

 We will never know, but my gut answer to your question is that if the wacky old witch had won, she would have wasted no time by jumping on poor Julian immediately , " to bring himto Justice"

On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 16:17:10 UTC+2, ogunlakaiye wrote:

Cornelius,

In this man-made world, do you think Julian Assange's case would have been written off if Hilary Clinton had won the last US presidential election?

S. Kadiri
 




Från: usaafric...@googlegroups.com <usaafric...@googlegroups.com> för Cornelius Hamelberg <cornelius...@gmail.com>
Skickat: den 19 maj 2017 19:55
Till: USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
Ämne: USA Africa Dialogue Series - God's wonderful world
 

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfric...@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDial...@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
Listserv moderated by Toyin Falola, University of Texas at Austin
To post to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue@googlegroups.com
To subscribe to this group, send an email to USAAfricaDialogue+subscribe@googlegroups.com
Current archives at http://groups.google.com/group/USAAfricaDialogue
Early archives at http://www.utexas.edu/conferences/africa/ads/index.html
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "USA Africa Dialogue Series" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to usaafricadialogue+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

No comments:

Post a Comment

 
Vida de bombeiro Recipes Informatica Humor Jokes Mensagens Curiosity Saude Video Games Car Blog Animals Diario das Mensagens Eletronica Rei Jesus News Noticias da TV Artesanato Esportes Noticias Atuais Games Pets Career Religion Recreation Business Education Autos Academics Style Television Programming Motosport Humor News The Games Home Downs World News Internet Car Design Entertaimment Celebrities 1001 Games Doctor Pets Net Downs World Enter Jesus Variedade Mensagensr Android Rub Letras Dialogue cosmetics Genexus Car net Só Humor Curiosity Gifs Medical Female American Health Madeira Designer PPS Divertidas Estate Travel Estate Writing Computer Matilde Ocultos Matilde futebolcomnoticias girassol lettheworldturn topdigitalnet Bem amado enjohnny produceideas foodasticos cronicasdoimaginario downloadsdegraca compactandoletras newcuriosidades blogdoarmario arrozinhoii sonasol halfbakedtaters make-it-plain amatha